European quality indicators developed by the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer: a first nationwide assessment for the Dutch setting.

PURPOSE: This observational study aims to assess the feasibility of calculating indicators developed by the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) for the Dutch breast cancer population. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer between 2012 and 2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Outcomes of the quality indicators (QI) were presented as mean scores and were compared to a stated norm. Variation between hospitals was assessed by standard deviations and funnel plots and trends over time were evaluated. The quality indicator calculator (QIC) was validated by comparing these outcomes with the outcomes of constructed algorithms in Stata. RESULTS: In total, 133,527 patients were included. Data for 24 out of 26 QIs were available in the NCR. For 67% and 67% of the QIs, a mean score above the norm and low or medium hospital variation was observed, respectively. The proportion of patients undergoing a breast reconstruction or neoadjuvant systemic therapy increased over time. The proportion treated within 4 weeks from diagnosis, having >10 lymph nodes removed or estrogen negative breast cancer who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy decreased. The outcomes of the constructed algorithms in this study and the QIC showed 100% similarity. CONCLUSION: Data from the NCR could be used for the calculation of more than 92% of the ECIBC indicators. The quality of breast cancer care in the Netherlands is high, as more than half of the QIs already score above the norm and medium hospital variation was observed. The QIC can be easy and reliably applied.

Comparing quality of breast cancer care in the Netherlands and Norway by federated propensity score analytics.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to benchmark and compare breast cancer care quality indicators (QIs) between Norway and the Netherlands using federated analytics preventing transfer of patient-level data. METHODS: Breast cancer patients (2017-2018) were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Cancer Registry of Norway. Five European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) QIs were assessed: two on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), two on surgical approaches, and one on postoperative radiotherapy. The QI outcomes were calculated using 'Vantage 6' federated Propensity Score Stratification (PSS). Likelihood of receiving a treatment was expressed in odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: In total, 39,163 patients were included (32,786 from the Netherlands and 6377 from Norway). PSS scores were comparable to the crude outcomes of the QIs. The Netherlands scored higher on the QI 'proportions of patients preoperatively examined with breast MRI' [37% vs.17.5%; OR 2.8 (95% CI 2.7-2.9)], the 'proportions of patients receiving primary systemic therapy examined with breast MRI' [83.3% vs. 70.8%; OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-3.3)], and 'proportion of patients receiving a single breast operation' [95.2% vs. 91.5%; OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.2)]. Country scores for 'immediate breast reconstruction' and 'postoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery' were comparable. The EUSOMA standard was achieved in both countries for 4/5 indicators. CONCLUSION: Both countries achieved high scores on the QIs. Differences were observed in the use of MRI and proportion of patients receiving single surgery. The federated approach supports future possibilities on benchmark QIs without transfer of privacy-sensitive data.

Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma from Pathology Reports.

To facilitate nationwide epidemiological research on advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), that is, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cSCC, we sought to develop and validate a rule-based algorithm that identifies advanced cSCC from pathology reports. The algorithm was based on both hierarchical histopathological codes and free text from pathology reports recorded in the National Pathology Registry. Medical files from the Erasmus Medical Center of 186 patients with stage III/IV/recurrent cSCC and 184 patients with stage I/II cSCC were selected and served as the gold standard to assess the performance of the algorithm. The rule-based algorithm showed a sensitivity of 91.9% (95% confidence interval = 88.0‒95.9), a specificity of 96.7% (95% confidence interval = 94‒2-99.3), and a positive predictive value of 78.5% (95% confidence interval = 74.2‒82.8) for all advanced cSCC combined. The sensitivity was lower per subgroup: locally advanced (52.3‒86.2%), recurrent cSCC (23.3%), and metastatic cSCC (70.0%). The specificity per subgroup was above 97%, and the positive predictive value was above 78%, with the exception of metastatic cSCC, which had a positive predictive value of 62%. This algorithm can be used to identify advanced patients with cSCC from pathology reports and will facilitate large-scale epidemiological studies of advanced cSCC in the Netherlands and internationally after external validation.

Adherence to the Dutch Breast Cancer Guidelines for Surveillance in Breast Cancer Survivors: Real-World Data from a Pooled Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Regular follow-up after treatment for breast cancer is crucial to detect potential recurrences and second contralateral breast cancer in an early stage. However, information about follow-up patterns in the Netherlands is scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Details concerning diagnostic procedures and policlinic visits in the first 5 years following a breast cancer diagnosis were gathered between 2009 and 2019 for 9916 patients from 4 large Dutch hospitals. This information was used to analyze the adherence of breast cancer surveillance to guidelines in the Netherlands. Multivariable logistic regression was used to relate the average number of a patient's imaging procedures to their demographics, tumor-treatment characteristics, and individual locoregional recurrence risk (LRR), estimated by a risk-prediction tool, called INFLUENCE. RESULTS: The average number of policlinic contacts per patient decreased from 4.4 in the first to 2.0 in the fifth follow-up year. In each of the 5 follow-up years, the share of patients without imaging procedures was relatively high, ranging between 31.4% and 33.6%. Observed guidelines deviations were highly significant (P < .001). A higher age, lower UICC stage, and having undergone radio- or chemotherapy were significantly associated with a higher chance of receiving an imaging procedure. The estimated average LRR-risk was 3.5% in patients without any follow-up imaging compared with 2.3% in patients with the recommended number of 5 imagings. CONCLUSION: Compared to guidelines, more policlinic visits were made, although at inadequate intervals, and fewer imaging procedures were performed. The frequency of imaging procedures did not correlate with the patients' individual risk profiles for LRR.

Representativeness of trial participants: linking the EORTC boost-no boost trial to the Netherlands cancer registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the representativeness of Dutch patients participating in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer EORTC boost-no-boost trial to the target breast cancer patient population. METHODS: All female breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1989 and 1996, aged ≤70 years, treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and linked to the EORTC trial database. Baseline characteristics were compared between trial and non-trial participants, for the Dutch population and according to seven participating institutions. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression were used to explore potential heterogeneity in overall survival between low, medium and high-volume institutes. RESULTS: Overall, 20,880 patients were identified from the NCR: 2,445 of 2,602 (94%) trial participants could be linked, and 18,435 were treated outside the trial. Trial participants had similar age, morphology, topography, laterality and socioeconomic status as non-trial participants, but more often stage I (62.7% vs. 56.4%) tumours and less often adjuvant treatment (22.9% vs. 26.5%). Crude 20-year survival ranged from 52.5% to 57.4%, without significant differences in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: This case study showed that participants in the boost-no-boost trial well represented the Dutch target population. Data linkage comes with challenges, but can close the gap between research and clinical practice.

Stage-specific trends in incidence and survival of cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands (2003-2018): A nationwide population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine stage-specific trends in the incidence and survival of cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands between 2003 and 2018, as well as the uptake of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and novel drugs during that period. METHODS: Data were obtained from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry for all patients diagnosed with invasive primary cutaneous melanoma (n = 60,267). We presented age-standardized incidence rates, the proportion of patients with an SLNB, the proportion of patients who received a novel drug (for their primary diagnosis) and one- and five-year relative survival rates. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2018, the incidence rate increased from 10.9 to 23.9 for men and from 15.6 to 27.3 for women. This increase reflected the increasing incidence rate of patients with stage I and III. The proportion of patients with an SLNB increased from 23% to 64%. A reasonable increase was observed in the proportion of patients with a positive outcome (from 2% to 11%). For patients with stage IV, there was a shift from chemotherapy towards novel drugs as from 2013. The five-year relative survival rate increased from 81% to 92% for men and from 88% to 96% for women. This increase reflected the increasing five-year relative survival rate of patients with stage II, III, and IV. CONCLUSION: We observed an increase in incidence for patients with stage I and III and an improvement in survival for patients with stage II, III and IV. These trends can be partly explained by the introduction of the SLNB and the novel drugs.

Effect of Case-Mix and Random Variation on Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators and Their Rankability.

OBJECTIVES: Hospital comparisons to improve quality of care require valid and reliable quality indicators. We aimed to test the validity and reliability of 6 breast cancer indicators by quantifying the influence of case-mix and random variation. METHODS: The nationwide population-based database included 79 690 patients with breast cancer from 91 Dutch hospitals between 2011 and 2016. The indicator-scores calculated were: (1) irradical breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for invasive disease, (2) irradical BCS for ductal carcinoma-in-situ, (3) breast contour-preserving treatment, (4) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, (5) radiotherapy for locally advanced disease, and (6) surgery within 5 weeks from diagnosis. Case-mix and random variation adjustments were performed by multivariable fixed and random effect logistic regression models. Rankability quantified the between-hospital variation, representing unexplained differences that might be the result of the level of quality of care, as low (<50%), moderate (50%-75%), or high (>75%). RESULTS: All of the indicators showed between-hospital variation with wide (interquartile) ranges. Case-mix adjustment reduced variation in indicators 1 and 3 to 5. Random variation adjustment (further) reduced the variation for all indicators. Case-mix and random variation adjustments influenced the indicator-scores of individual hospitals and their ranking. Rankability was poor for indicator 1, 2, and 5, and moderate for 3, 4, and 6. CONCLUSIONS: The 6 indicators lacked validity and/or reliability to a certain extent. Although measuring quality indicators may stimulate quality improvement in general, comparisons and judgments of individual hospital performance should be made with caution if based on indicators that have not been tested or adjusted for validity and reliability, especially in benchmarking.

Association between initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 30 days after surgery and overall survival among patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Delayed time to chemotherapy (TTC) is associated with decreased outcomes of breast cancer patients. Recently, studies suggested that the association might be subtype-dependent and that TTC within 30 days should be warranted in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The aim of the current study is to determine if TTC beyond 30 days is associated with reduced 10-year overall survival in TNBC patients. We identified all TNBC patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 who received adjuvant chemotherapy in the Netherlands. We distinguished between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) vs. mastectomy given the difference in preoperative characteristics and outcomes. The association was estimated with hazard ratios (HRs) using propensity-score matched Cox proportional hazard analyses. In total, 3,016 patients were included. In matched patients who underwent BCS (n = 904), 10-year overall survival was favorable for patients with TTC within 30 days (84.4% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.001). Patients with TTC beyond 30 days were more likely than those with TTC within 30 days to die within 10 years after surgery (HR 1.69 (95% CI 1.22-2.34), p = 0.002). In matched patients who underwent mastectomy (n = 1,568), there was no difference in 10 years overall survival between those with TTC within or beyond 30 days (74.5% vs. 74.7%, p = 0.716), nor an increased risk of death for those with TTC beyond 30 days (HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.84-1.28), p = 0.716). Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 30 days is associated with decreased 10 years overall survival in TNBC patients who underwent BCS. Therefore, timelier initiation of chemotherapy in TNBC patients undergoing BCS seems warranted.

An actualised population-based study on the use of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients in the Netherlands.

The utilization rate of RT increased from 64.4% in 2011 to 70.3% in 2015. After BCS and mastectomy, 97.3% and 26.1% of the patients received RT, respectively. For patients undergoing BCS and mastectomy, lower age and ER + tumours were associated with higher RT utilisation rates. After mastectomy, also larger tumour sizes, lymph node involvement, grade-2 and 3 tumours and diagnosis in more recent years were associated with higher RT use.

Regional Recurrence Risk Following a Negative Sentinel Node Procedure Does Not Approximate the False-Negative Rate of the Sentinel Node Procedure in Breast Cancer Patients Not Receiving Radiotherapy or Systemic Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Although the false-negative rate of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients is 5-7%, reported regional recurrence (RR) rates after negative SLNB are much lower. Adjuvant treatment modalities probably contribute to this discrepancy. This study assessed the 5-year RR risk after a negative SLNB in the subset of patients who underwent breast amputation without radiotherapy or any adjuvant treatment. METHODS: All patients operated for primary unilateral invasive breast cancer between 2005 and 2008 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients with a negative SLNB who underwent breast amputation and who were not treated with axillary lymph node dissection, radiotherapy, or any adjuvant systemic treatment were selected. The cumulative 5-year RR rate was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 13,452 patients were surgically treated for primary breast cancer and had a negative SLNB, and 2012 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. Thirty-eight RRs occurred during follow-up. Multifocal disease was associated with a higher risk of developing RR (P = 0.04). The median time to RR was 27 months and was significantly shorter in patients with estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer (9.5 months; P = 0.003). The 5-year RR rate was 2.4% in the study population compared with 1.1% in the remainder of 11,440 SLNB-negative patients (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Excluding the effect of radiotherapy and systemic treatment resulted in a twofold 5-year RR risk in breast cancer patients with a tumor-free SLNB. This 5-year RR rate was still much lower than the reported false-negative rate of the SLNB procedure.

Discrepancies Between Surgical Oncologists and Plastic Surgeons in Patient Information Provision and Personal Opinions Towards Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) may improve quality of life of patients receiving mastectomy. However, a significant hospital variation exists in the use of IBR due to various reasons. To better understand this variation, the present study investigated preoperative information provision to patients and personal opinions of surgical oncologists and plastic surgeons towards potential contra-indications for IBR. METHODS: An online survey (35 questions) was developed including questions on respondent demographics, information provision to the patient about IBR and potential contra-indications by IBR technique. RESULTS: One-hundred-eighty-nine physicians participated: 118 surgical oncologists and 71 plastic surgeons. All clinicians discussed the possibility of IBR with their patients. Complications (79% versus 100%, P < 0.001) and aesthetic outcomes (83% versus 99%, P = 0.001) were discussed less frequently by surgical oncologists than by plastic surgeons.Patient age >75 years, breast size >D-cup, BMI >40 kg/m, smoking (for implant reconstruction), pulmonary/cardiac comorbidities (for autologous reconstruction) and radiotherapy were considered a contra-indication more frequently by plastic surgeons. In contrast, surgical oncologists reported tumor stage (≥cT3), nodal stage (≥cN2) and chemotherapy more frequently to be a contra-indication for IBR. CONCLUSION: We observed that all respondents discussed the possibility of IBR with their patients, whereas patient-tailored information was given more frequently by plastic surgeons. Physicians differed in their opinions towards contra-indications for IBR, with plastic surgeons reporting patient-related risk factors for wound healing problems and surgical oncologists reporting oncological contra-indications more frequently. Consensus between physicians regarding contra-indications for IBR may optimize patient counseling and shared decision-making.

Use and Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Relation to the Clinical Risk of Developing Metastases in Early Breast Cancer Patients in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: The nationwide use of the 21-gene recurrence score (21-RS) and implications regarding chemotherapy administration in relation to clinical risk in early breast cancer patients are investigated. METHODS: Breast cancer patients surgically treated between 2014 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and categorized as having a clinical low, intermediate, or high risk of developing metastases. Deployment of the 21-RS is advocated in patients with an intermediate risk of developing metastases. The use and impact of the 21-RS test result on chemotherapy administration were assessed in relation to the clinical risk as well as patient and tumor characteristics; χ2 tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of all patients, 20,488 were considered as clinical low-, 4,309 as intermediate-, and 15,266 as high-risk patients. The 21-RS was deployed in 0.1% (n = 23), 3.2% (n = 137), and 0.6% (n = 90) of these categories, respectively. In the clinical intermediate-risk group, the 21-RS assigned 73.7, 13.1, and 13.1% of patients to the genomic low-, intermediate-, and high-risk category, respectively. Adherence to the 21-RS was 95.6% in these patients. CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, the 21-RS test is applied both inside and outside the guideline-directed area. In case of discordance between the genomic and clinical risk, patients were treated in line with the result of the 21-RS.

Clinical auditing as an instrument for quality improvement in breast cancer care in the Netherlands: The national NABON Breast Cancer Audit.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, the NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA) was instituted as a nation-wide audit to address quality of breast cancer care and guideline adherence in the Netherlands. The development of the NBCA and the results of 4 years of auditing are described. METHODS: Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or in situ carcinoma (DCIS) and information regarding diagnosis and treatment are collected in all hospitals (n = 92) in the Netherlands. Thirty-two quality indicators measuring care structure, processes and outcomes were evaluated over time and compared between hospitals. RESULTS: The NBCA contains data of 56,927 patients (7,649 DCIS and 49,073 invasive cancers). Patients being discussed in pre- and post-operative multidisciplinary team meetings improved (2011: 83% and 91%; 2014: 98% and 99%, respectively) over the years. Tumour margin positivity rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive cancer requiring re-operation were consistently low (∼5%). Other indicators, for example, the use of an MRI-scan prior to surgery or immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy showed considerable hospital variation. CONCLUSIONS: Results shown an overall high quality of breast cancer care in all hospitals in the Netherlands. For most quality indicators improvement was seen over time, while some indicators showed yet unexplained variation. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:243-249. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Factors Associated with the Use of Gene Expression Profiles in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer guidelines suggest the use of gene expression profiles (GEPs) in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients in whom controversy exists regarding adjuvant chemotherapy benefit based on traditional prognostic factors alone. We evaluated the current use of GEPs in these patients in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary breast cancer patients treated between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014 and eligible for GEP use according to the Dutch national breast cancer guideline were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry: ER+ patients <70 years with grade 1 tumors >2 cm or grade 2 tumors 1-2 cm without overt lymph node metastases (pN0-Nmi). Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was performed to associate characteristics of patients, tumors and hospitals with GEP use. RESULTS: GEPs were increasingly deployed: 12% of eligible patients received a GEP in 2011 versus 46% in 2014. Lobular versus ductal morphology (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.72), pN1mi status (versus pN0, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.68), and tumor size (>3 cm vs. >2 cm, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.88) were inversely associated with GEP use. High socioeconomic status (SES) (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.64) and younger age (OR 0.96/year increasing age, 95% CI 0.95-0.96) were positively associated with GEP use. GEP use per hospital did vary, but no predefined institutional factors remained independently associated with GEP use. CONCLUSION: GEP use increased over time and was influenced by patient- and tumor-associated factors as well as by SES.